Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J
MANOJ RAMESH SURYAWANSHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal representatives presented arguments regarding bail based on applicant's previous record and severity of the allegations. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. the case involves robbery of a bank and the applicant's alleged involvement with complete recovery of stolen items. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. the court grants bail citing applicant's lack of prior criminal records and anticipated long trial duration. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. conditions for bail are outlined including prohibition from contacting informants and cooperation with the trial. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 19/08/2025 P.C. :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2. The applicant is seeking bail as he was arrested in connection with crime No. 93/2023 dated 1.6.2023 registered with Shanipeth Police Station, Jalgaon for the offence under section 394 of I.P.C.
3. The case against the applicant and other co-accused is that they have committed robbery in State Bank of India, Branch Kalika Mata Mandir, Jalgaon. The applicant is the employed in the said bank on contract basis. It is stated that on 1.6.2023 the applicant and the co-accused have committed robbery
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
