Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
N. J. JAMADAR, J
Sushila Suresh Malge – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial facts of deceitful flat sales established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented on civil nature vs. criminal intent. (Para 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 3. evidence of systematic fraud through multiple sales demonstrated. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's legal reasoning on distinguishing fraud from contract breach. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. final rejection of pre-arrest bail application affirmed. (Para 26) |
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATED: 27th JANUARY, 2025 ORDER:-
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, the learned Counsel for the intervener and the learned APP for the State.
2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.155 of 2023, registered with Rabale Police Station, Navi MUmbai, for an offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the Penal Code”).
3. Jaspalsingh Malhotra, the first informant’s husband, had booked a flat in a Project Green World, Digha Airoli, Navi Mumbai, being Flat No.A2/1903. The said project was developed by M/s. Mount Mary Builders, of which the applicant Sushila Suresh Malge is the Proprietress. India Bulls Distribution Services Pvt. Ltd. was appointed as a marketing agent. An allotme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
