BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. W. Chandwani, J
XYZ – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
CORAM :- M. W. CHANDWANI, J.
DATED :- 24.04.2025 Heard.
2. The petition challenges the order dated 21.11.2023 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Amravati (for short, “ASJ”) whereby, the application Exh.43 filed by the accused in Sessions Case No. 245/2021 before the learned ASJ for supplying the copy of the Pen-drive, which has been relied on by the prosecution has been allowed. It will not necessary to go into the matrix of the case. It is suffice to say that, respondent no. 2 and 3 are facing charges under Sections 376 (2)(n), 313, 294, 506, 507 and 323 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) along with Sections 3(i)(w)(i) (ii) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 before the learned ASJ.
3. Additional charge-sheet along with a Pen- drive also came to be filed by the Investigating Agency in the said case. Respondent no. 2 and 3/accused applied for directions to the prosecution to supply the copy of the Pendrive, which came to be allowed. Feeling aggrieved with the said order, the petitioner/victim has approached this Court by way of the present petition.
4. Mrs. Shweta Chavan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.