SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6468

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. W. Chandwani, J
XYZ – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Shweta Chavan
For the Respondents: Ms. S. N. Thakur, Shri M. N. Ali

CORAM :- M. W. CHANDWANI, J.

DATED :- 24.04.2025 Heard.

2. The petition challenges the order dated 21.11.2023 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Amravati (for short, “ASJ”) whereby, the application Exh.43 filed by the accused in Sessions Case No. 245/2021 before the learned ASJ for supplying the copy of the Pen-drive, which has been relied on by the prosecution has been allowed. It will not necessary to go into the matrix of the case. It is suffice to say that, respondent no. 2 and 3 are facing charges under Sections 376 (2)(n), 313, 294, 506, 507 and 323 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) along with Sections 3(i)(w)(i) (ii) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 before the learned ASJ.

3. Additional charge-sheet along with a Pen- drive also came to be filed by the Investigating Agency in the said case. Respondent no. 2 and 3/accused applied for directions to the prosecution to supply the copy of the Pendrive, which came to be allowed. Feeling aggrieved with the said order, the petitioner/victim has approached this Court by way of the present petition.

4. Mrs. Shweta Chavan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top