SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Abhay S. Waghwase, J
Vasim Pinjari @ Vasim Sarvar Pinjari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. S. T. Kazi
For the Respondents: Mr. M. K. Goyanka, APP

CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

Reserved on : 21.08.2025 Pronounced on : 22.08.2025 ORDER :

1. This is a pre-arrest bail application apprehending arrest in Crime No. 0390 of 2025 registered at Shahada Police Station, District Nandurbar for offences under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2)

r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita .

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that alleged incident has taken place all of a sudden in the background of throwing garbage. That, there was no intention. That, there are allegations of assault by means of a stick. That, there is cross complaint, copy of cross complaint is placed on record and therefore, learned counsel submits that there is possibility of counter blast. Lastly, it is submitted that considering the nature of allegations, custodial interrogation is not required.

3. Learned APP opposed application on the ground that there is use of stick in assaulting on head and causing injury. That, injury certificate is placed on record. That, vital part like head is targeted and prior to it, there is threat to kill. Hence, for above reasons, it is his submission that serious offence of attempt to commit murder is committed and he seeks rejecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top