BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S.R. AGRAWAL, Registrar
SHRI.ISHAQ UMAR PATRAWALA(DELETED) 1A)SHRI.IBRAHIM ISHAQ PATRAWALA.1B)SHRI.ABDULGANI ISHAQ PATRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
1A)SMT.AKBRI KHANAM WD/O.SHRIL ABDUL HAW SON OF SIBLIKHAN TIHUL KHAN AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2011 Ofoce Notes, Ofoce Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders CORAM : S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL. - II)
DATE : 21st August, 2025 None present.
The notice issued to Respondent No.1(A)
is returned unserved with bailiff remark “Expired”.
The above numbered Civil Revision Application is listed for second time on the board of Registrar for taking steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.1(A). Already six weeks time has been granted, however, despite of granting six weeks time, Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps for bringing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.1(A), till date.
Here reference to Chapter VII Rule 6 Sub rule 1 and 2 of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short “Rules”) may be conveniently made. It states about Processes, Process fees, Printing Charges, Security for costs and other procedure after admission etc.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII Rule 6(2), in cases where 90 days have elapsed from the reported death
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.