Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, JJ, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ
Pradeep @ Shappu Janardhan Kokate – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments by the appellant divya. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 2. court's observations on evidence presented. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. court analysis of circumstantial evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. details on electronic evidence and witness testimony. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. court's analysis of mobile phone evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. analysis of forensic evidence related to firearms. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. impact of ballistic evidence on the case. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 8. witnesses' identification and credibility. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 9. conclusions regarding circumstantial evidence. (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 10. summary of key forensic findings. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 11. result of prosecution’s case against pradeep. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 12. discussion on conspiracy and relationships. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 13. assessment of divya's involvement in conspiracy. (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 14. legal principles regarding conspiracy evidence. (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
| 15. final order regarding both appellants. (Para 78) |
RESERVED ON : 3rd JULY, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2025 JUDGMENT (PER SANDIPKUMAR C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
