Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Sachin S. Deshmukh, J
Namrata d/o Subhash Pawar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint concerning public servant prosecution initiation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal counsel arguments regarding statutory protections. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. judicial obligations of magistrates specified. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. conclusion directing cancellation of litigation based on procedural failures. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :-
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the parties.
2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2025, confirming the order dated 06.05.2025 of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindhkheda, in Criminal Misc. Application No. 50 of 2025, directing the registration of crime and investigation of the same under Section 175 (3) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “ BNSS ” for short).
3. Pursuant to the order rendered by the learned Magistrate, the Crime No. 112 of 2025 was registered at Sindhkheda Police Station in relation to alleged irregularities in allotment of plots in Nardana Industrial Area of Tahsil Sindhkheda, Dist. Dhule. The complainant, a Practicing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
