Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BHARATI DANGRE, SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ
Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the enforcement of criminal law reflects a nation’s civilization. (Para 1) |
| 2. registration of fir based on complaints of deepfake videos. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. contentions regarding illegal arrest and violations of rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. argument on the necessity of procedural compliance during arrest. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court’s examination of arrest procedures and rights under the constitution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. mandates for proper recording and justification of arrest reasons. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. judiciary's role in preventing arbitrary arrest and preserving liberty. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. conditions for lawful arrest as per statutory provisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. individualized justification required for arrests in criminal cases. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. court emphasizes individual assessment in case of arrest. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. arrest procedures must reflect personal accountability and not be mechanical. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 12. declaration of illegal arrest leading to release on bail. (Para 30) |
| 13. final order granting the petitioner release on bail. (Para 31) |
JUDGMENT
(PER BHARATI DANGRE, J) :-
1. “The quality of a nation’s civilisation can be largely measur
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
