SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 13

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Hariram – Appellant
Versus
Shrimati Jasoti – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. N. Deshpande
For the Respondents: K. S. Mishra

1. The applicant Hariram has filed this application against the order of the Assistant Judge, Nagpur, in Civil Appeal No. 200 - A of 1960, rejecting his appeal against an order under O.7, R.10, Civil Procedure Code , by which the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur returned his petition for granting a decree of divorce under S.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for presentation to proper Court.

2. No appearance is put in on behalf of the opponent though names of two counsel are shown as having entered appearance on behalf of the opponent. Shri R. N. Deshpande, an Advocate of this Court, intimated at the commencement of the hearing that Shri K. S. Mishra was in charge of the case and he had no instructions. I have declined to adjourn the hearing as the case was posted as first case on today's board of which notice was duly given in the Daily Board.

3. The case of the applicant is that he was married under Hindu law to the opponent Shrimati Jasoti in August 1944 at Karachi in Sindh before the partition. There is no doubt that Karachi is now a part of Pakistan and therefore a foreign territory. The allegation in the plaint is that about six months prior to the partition, the applicant disco






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top