SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Maruti Gurappa v. Krishna Bala


Advocates:
For the Appellants: Mr. Guttal
For the Respondents: Mr. Pathak

Table of Content
1. nature of claim under contract of sale (Para 1 , 4 , 5)

1. This appeal raises an intresting question of law namely whether the person who has obtained property on the basis of a contract of sale can maintain a suit against an auction purchaser of the same property. The material facts briefly stated are as follows :

2. The suit property (i.e. survey Nos. 162 and 177) (half share) originally belonged to defendant No. 3 and two others. On 12-4-1949 defendant No. 3 and two others entered into an agreement for selling the said property to the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 1,600/-. Part of the sale price i.e. Rs. 585/- was paid on the date of the agreement and the plaintiff was put in possession of the property. In the month of May, 1949, defendant No. 2 obtained a decree against defendant No. 3. In execution of the said decree, the land in suit was sold in auction and purchased by Deft. No. 1. Deft. No. 1 started proceedings for recovering possession of the property on the basis of the sale certificate. The Plaintiff obstructed the delivery of possession. Proceedings were started by the auction purchaser for removing the obstruction under R.99 of O.21 of the Code of Civil















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top