SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 38

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
*Kotval, C. J., Bal, J.
Jagjivan Kanji Bhojani v. Mangal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. at Bombay


Table of Content
1. initial descriptions of the dispute and prior decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. importance of interim orders and hearing parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. regulatory authority of registrar under section 95. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. clarification on the definition of dispute. (Para 11 , 12)
5. explanation of the context and point of law. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. affirmation of authority to grant interim relief. (Para 17 , 18)
7. final decision on the interim relief order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

1. This petition arises out of an alleged dispute between the petitioners, who are the members of a Co - operative Society and the Co - operative Society known as Mangal Co - operative Housing Society Ltd., the first respondent before us. It appears that at one time the Society had entered into an agreement with the petitioners for the allotment to them of two flats Nos. 13 and 14 after the building which the Co - operative Society was constructing was completed. As a result of a change in the size of the flats there were disputes between the petitioner and the Society and those disputes came to be determined first by the Registrar's Nominee on 14th August, 1961 (Disputes Nos. 120 and 121































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top