Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Rani Annapurnabai – Appellant
Versus
Court of Wards, Nagpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the litigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 2. arguments related to the maintainability of the suit. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis on the definition of 'government ward.' (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 20) |
| 4. discussion on the powers and obligations of the court of wards. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. legal reasoning against treating the appellant as a government ward. (Para 26 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. conclusion and direction for the trial court. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
1. The appellant, the original plaintiff - Rani Annapurnabai is widow of Raje Bahadur Raghuji Rao Bhonsle. In this appeal, she has challenged the dismissal of her suit by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur on the ground that the suit was filed in violation of the provisions of S.27 and S.30 of the Central Provinces Court of Wards Act , i. e. Act No. XXIV of 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the Court of Wards Act ).
2. Certain facts leading to this litigation may be stated to appreciate the rival contentions between the parties.
3. In paragraph 1 of the plaint (Ex. 1), the appellant has given a genealogical table of the family of the late Shri Raje Bahadur Raghuji Rao Bho
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
