SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 21

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Chandrakant Ramrao Saraf v. Shri Punde


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sawant
For the Respondents: Mr. Dalvi

Table of Content
1. petitioners contest their removal from the voters' list. (Para 1 , 2)
2. tahsildar's authority questioned; procedure required for disqualification. (Para 3 , 4)
3. review of statutory provisions and their implications. (Para 5 , 6)
4. determination of disqualification must allow for due process. (Para 8)
5. tahsildar's action deemed illegal and reversed. (Para 9 , 10)

1. (25-6-1969):In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution the grievance of the six petitioners who were members of the Turkabad Village Gram Panchayat is that their membership of the Panchayat had been illegally treated as vacated and cancelled and consequently on July 19, 1967 their names were illegally deleted from the voters' list for Gangapur Gat Panchayat Samiti, Turkabad. The grievance of the first petitioner is that on the basis of deletion of his name from the voters' list on July 19, 1967, the Tahsildar, as Returning Officer, Panchayat Samiti Election. Tauka Gangapur had illegally rejected the first petitioner's nomination for contesting the election for the membership of Panchayat Samiti.

2. The only facts which need to be noticed are as follows:
The petitioners were elected as members o

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top