BOMBAY HIGH COURT
R. R. Bhole, J.
State v. Shantilal Vallabhadas Pandya Dist. Wardha
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disorderly conduct in polling stations is criminal. (Para 1) |
| 2. definition and argument over cognizability of offences. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. statute allows for arrest without warrant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. judgment affirmed, conviction upheld. (Para 8) |
1. This is a reference by the Learned Sessions Judge, Wardha, for quashing the conviction passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, (Second Court). Wardha, on an accused who was found guilty under S.26(2) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act . He is alleged to have behaved in a disorderly manner within the premises of a polling station on the day of the election. On 14-6-1967 there was an election going on in the Municipal Town Hall at Pulgaon. On that day accused No. 1 Shantilal for whom the reference is made and another accused Dwarka Prasad were shouting and behaving in a disorderly manner in the premises of that Polling Station and causing disturbances. The Presiding Officer as well as the Polling Officers who were on duty could not, therefore, continue their work. The Presiding Officer, therefore, reported the matter to the Police Officers there and in consequence thereof, both the accused were arrested and c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.