SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Vaidya, J
Amin Abdul Kadar Murtasa v. Jivraj Otmal Ratnagirl Bhagidari a firm


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dalvi

Table of Content
1. filing of special civil suit by the respondent firm. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's interpretation of obligations under consent decrees. (Para 3 , 8 , 12 , 13)
3. arguments regarding discharge of surety based on consent decree. (Para 4 , 5 , 14)
4. conflicts in judgments regarding surety obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
5. conclusion on the appeal and its dismissal. (Para 15 , 16)

1. Special Civil Suit No.3 of 1967 was filed by the respondent - firm for recovery of an amount of Rupees 22,717.12 and costs with interest at 12 per cent, per annum from the date of suit till recovery. The defendant put in contentions disputing the claim of the plaintiff. After filing the suit, an application for attachment before judgment under O.38, R.5 of the Civil Procedure Code was made by the plaintiff. The property was attached but the attachment was removed as the defendant furnished security in the shape of a surety bond executed by the present appellant agreeing to hold himself liable for the decree to be passed to the extent of Rs.25,000/-.

2. Subsequently on November 14, 1968 a consent decree was made by the trial Court for Rs.22,717.12, costs of the suit and interest at 12 per cent, per



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top