Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Raghunath Gopal v. Sau. Vijaya Raghunath
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case introduction and details of marriage. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent denies allegations of fraud. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of evidence regarding epilepsy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petitioner's argument on fraud interpretation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. definition of fraud in hindu marriage context. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. precedents related to fraudulent misrepresentation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. discussion on discovery of fraud. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. court's ruling on consent and cruelty. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. conclusion of appeal dismissal. (Para 20) |
1. This is a second appeal against the Judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Poona, in Civil Appeal No.646 of 1967 on his file from the decree in Marriage Petition No.18 of 1963 of the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Poona. It arises this way.
2. The appellant - petitioner was married to the respondent at Poona on 30th March 1962 according to Hindu religious rites. The petitioner alleged that during the negotiations as well as at the time of the solemnization of the marriage the respondent and her parents not only concealed the fact that she was suffering from epilepsy since childhood but also misrepresented to him a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
