SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
*M. N. Chandurkar, Dharmadhikari, JJ.
President of the Council, Katol – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Councillors – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's challenge based on councillor disqualification. (Para 1 , 4)
2. meeting remains valid despite alleged procedural failures. (Para 2 , 9 , 10)
3. collector's decision crucial for disqualification. (Para 3 , 6 , 8)

1. The petitioner is this petition is the President of the Council, Katol, and the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 are the Municipal Councillors. Admittedly, on 5-9-1972 some Councillors gave a requisition to the Sub-Divisional Officer Katol who was performing the duties and exercising the powers of the Collector under S.55 of the Maharashtra Municipalities Ad, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for a meeting to be called in which a resolution of no - confidence in the petitioner was to be mowed. On 6-9-1972 the Sub-Divisional Officer issued the necessary notice convening the meeting for 13-9-1972. The petitioner then immediately filed this petition praying that the notice of the meeting issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer should be quashed because, according to him, the three respondents who were signatories to the requisition had incurred a disqualification and. therefore ceased to be Councillors. According to the petitioner, the respondents


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top