SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Sakharam Shinde and Others v. Vilas Anant Deshpande and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Babasaheb Bhonsale
For the Respondents: Mr. Naik

1. The question raised by Mr. Babasaheb Bhonsale appearing for the petitioners in this petition which arises out of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter, the Tenancy Act) is, really speaking, one which presents quite some difficulty. It reveals the shortcomings of the draftsmen who have to burn the midnight oil for the purpose of effecting so many amendments in the Tenancy Act.

2. The question arises in the following circumstances : -

3. The land in question has Survey No. 316 admeasuring 39 Acres, 23 Gunthas. Respondent No. 1 herein (hereinafter, the Respondent) was the owner of the same till the demise of the present petitioner who is the tenant of the same at all relevant times. Respondent No. 1 was born on 1-2-1952 which means that he would attain majority on 1-2-1970. On 25-3-1957 the respondent applied for possession of one half portion of the lands in question which, for the sake of brevity, is referred to hereinafter as 'the said lands'. That application was filed under S.31 of the Tenancy Act. It may be stated here that under S.31 of the Tenancy Act, the landlord can apply for possession of the lands let out by him to the tenant if he required


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top