SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
His Lordship, J
State of Maharashtra v. Manohar Kashinath Ghodake and Another


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Mistry

Table of Content
1. background context of political rivalry affecting the accused and victims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the attack and subsequent events leading to the complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arrest and trial proceedings against the accused. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's assessment of guilt and arguments regarding sentencing. (Para 9 , 10)

1. This is a little unusual case being an off - shoot of the companion case. The present accused Nos. 1 and 2 are accused Nos. 8 and 7 respectively in the companion case. The theatre of the offences is the same village Ambe of District Solapur. The present offences are a sequel to and were committed within about three months of those which are a subject - matter of the companion case and were the result of the enmity between the same two families of the said village.

2. One Ganpat Shinde of the said village had six sons, Bhagwan, Gajendra, (murdered in the companion case), Mahada, Shiva (injured in the companion case), Bhiva (murdered in the present case) and Balkrishna, (injured in the present case) and all of them were residing separately in their respective houses, in the same village. These brothers belonged to the Janata Party. One Baban Gaikwa


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top