SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
A.V. Chandrachud, J
Manohar v. State of Maharashtra and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Deshpande
For the Respondents: Mr. Desai

1. In this petition under Art.226 of the Constitution the validity of sub-section (5) of S.73 - A of the Maharashtra Co - operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act) has been called in question.

2. S.73 - A of the Act was inserted in the Act by the Maharashtra Co - operative Societies (Second Amendment) Act, 1969 (Act No. XXVII of 1969), which came into force on July 1, 1971. Sub-section (5) of S.73 - A runs as under
"(5) No person shall be, or shall continue to be a designated officer of any society of any of the categories referred to in sub-section (2) for a consecutive period of more than six years, and at the expiration of that period any such person shall cease to be a designated officer of that society, and shall not be eligible for being re - elected or reappointed as a designated officer, until a period of three years has elapsed after the expiry of the aforesaid period of six years. Explanation : For the purposes of this sub-section -
(a) in calculating the consecutive period of six years in office, any period for which the person concerned may have been such officer, before the commencement of the Maharashtra Co - operative Societies (Second Amendme


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top