Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. C. Dharmadhikari, J
Paradkar P. R. v. Union of India and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged illegitimate tree cutting notices. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner claimed valid permissions based on prior approval. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. government argued for discretionary conditions for felling permissions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court noted the validity of the extension request for felling. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. court ruled the petitioner sought relief without clean hands. (Para 11) |
| 6. the writ petition was ultimately dismissed. (Para 12) |
1. The petitioner who is a citizen of India, is the owner of a property known as "Dergun" situated at Vaghurem Satari, Valpoi, which is surveyed under No. 47/1 By this writ petition under Art 226 of the Constitution of India, he challenges the demand notices bearing Nos. 31 Off-Case/ 85-86/1169 and 31 Off-Case/85-86/1178 both dt. 21st Oct. 1985.
2. The petitioner's case is that he was granted a permission dt. 14-2-1984 for felling trees in his above identified property Dergun and under the said license, the time for cutting the trees was limited to 90 days from the date of license. The said license is deemed to have been issued under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 , for no permission for cutting trees
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
