BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Kotwal, J
Paru Mrugesh Jaikrishna v. Assistant Collector of Customs Preventive; Deptt. Bombay and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of facts leading to prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding insufficiency of evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court observations on evidence and legal principles. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion to quash judicial process. (Para 13) |
1. This is an application filed by the original accused 4 under S. 482 of the Cr. P.C. for quashing of process issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay in Case No. 28 / CW of 1986 whereunder the petitioner along with six others are sought to be prosecuted under S. 120 - B of the Penal Code read with S. 135 of the Customs Act .
2. The facts leading to the filing of the present application can be enumerated as under: -
On the 19th Mar., 1985 the original accused 2 and 3 were apprehended at the Sahar Air - port by the Customs Intelligence Officer when they were found to be carrying, foreign exchange. On their statements being recorded by the Customs Intelligence Officer, the original accused 1 who is the husband of the petitioner was apprehended at the domestic air - port and his statement was recorded separately. During the course of investigation the statements of accused 5 and 6 were recorded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.