Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. P. Bharucha, J.
Ashoke Arya v. M. V. Kapitan Mitsos and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claims regarding vessel sales. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court observations on statutory amendments. (Para 3 , 9 , 11 , 18 , 20) |
| 3. key legal arguments regarding b.p.t.'s rights. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. summary of statutory rights regarding liens. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 5. final ruling on priority of the b.p.t.'s claim. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiff in an Admiralty Suit. It seeks a declaration that the plaintiff has priority for his claim, which has been decreed, against the sale proceeds of the 1st defendant vessel (M. V. Kapitan Mitsos), which are lying in Court; in the alternative, for a declaration that his claim ranks pari passu with the claim of the Trustees of the Port of Bombay (B.P.T.) for anchorage fees in regard to the said vessel; and for ancillary reliefs.
2. The said vessel entered the port of Bombay on 9th June, 1980 and remained therein until after 24th Oct., 1985. It was first arrested by this Court in Admiralty Suit No. 13 of 1980, Adam Abdul Khan v. M. V. Kapitan Mitsos.
3. On 27th Sept., 1980 the B.P.T. passed a resolution sanctioning an amendment to its Port and Pilotage Scale of Rates. The san
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
