BOMBAY HIGH COURT
J. S. Padhye, J
Kaker R. N. v. Shabir Fidahusein and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. status of directorate revenue intelligence officers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. clarification on confession admissibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. comparison of powers under different acts. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. final ruling on admissibility of statements. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. Two questions arise in this petition : (a) Whether the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Customs, Narcotics Control Bureau of the Central Excise, are police officers while investigating offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ?
(b) Whether the statements made before them are inadmissible in evidence under S.25 of the Evidence Act or under S.162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ?
2. The facts leading to the present petition, are briefly as follows : On 4th September, 1987 on the basis of a secret information, the Officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (D.R.I.) Bombay, assisted by the Officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau, Bombay, intercepted a Taxi bearing Registration No. MRO 6230, near Hotel Fariyas at Colaba, Bombay, Respondent No. 1 was the sole occupant as driver of the said taxi. The Officers saw a zipper bag at the feet of respondent No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.