SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 5

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
A, B, JJ
S. G. Pharmaceuticals v. Pademwar


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Name 1, Name 2]
For the Respondents: [Name 3, Name 4]

1 This letters patent appeal by the original non applicant is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge affirming the finding rendered by the Third Labour Court, Nagpur, in I.D.A. No. 20 of 1981 holding that the respondent No. 2 is a workman under S.2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

2 The appellant is a manufacturer of modern drug products while the 2nd respondent is employed by it as a Medical Representative on a monthly salary of Rs. 1,150 by the letter of appointment dated 10th March, 1977. On 28th January, 1981, the 2nd respondent filed an application before the Labour Court, under S.33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, claiming bonus under the provisions of the Bonus Act for claiming the years 1977-78 to 1979-80 amounting to Rs. 2,250. The Labour Court held upon a preliminary issue raised by the appellant, by its order dated May 28, 1982, that the 2nd respondent was a worker within the meaning of S.2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act and that finding was challenged by the appellant in Writ Petition No. 1525 of 1982 and this Court by its judgment delivered on September 29, 1982 remanded the matter for finding out, if necessary after recording fresh evid
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top