Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Rafiq Dada, J
Kamal V. M. Allaudin and etc. etc. v. Raja Shaikh and etc. etc.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of family court over matrimonial matters. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. parties' arguments related to jurisdiction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. relevant provisions of the family courts act. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. interpretations of jurisdiction by counsel. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. conflicts in interpretations of laws. (Para 18 , 19 , 23) |
| 6. concept and implications of a district court. (Para 34 , 35 , 38) |
| 7. procedural distinctions in family courts. (Para 42 , 46 , 55) |
| 8. decision on jurisdiction of family court. (Para 68) |
| 9. conclusion on transfer of cases to family court. (Para 70 , 71) |
1. These are Matrimonial Petitions and Suits which involve a common question of law, namely, whether these matters stand transferred or should be transferred to the Family Court, Bombay established the Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. LXVI of 1984). The Family Court was established in the City of Bombay as from 7th October 1989, and the Act has been brought into force for the purpose of the said court as from that day. Since the question involved is likely to arise in several other Matrimonial Suits or Petitions pending in this court, I thought it convenient to request the counsel appearing in all
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
