Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
N/A, J
Sadanand alias Sadu alias Sada Vasudeo Shetty v. A. S. Samra Commissioner of police Greater Bombay and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detention order for maintaining public order. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. claim of violation of constitutional rights in detention. (Para 5 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. delay in representation handling as a legal concern. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. assessment of delay sufficiency in representation processing. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. direct rulings clarify authority limitations under nsa. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. no revocation power for detaining authority. (Para 20) |
| 7. conclusion: petition is dismissed. (Para 21) |
1. This Petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the detenu challenging the order dated 16th August 1993 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay, under S.3 sub-section (2) of the National Security Act , 1980. The order came to be passed against the detenu with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the "maintenance of public order. The grounds of detention were served on the detenu pari passu.
2. Considering the two points raised by the learned Advocate for the detenu, it is not necessary to state in detail the grounds on which the detenu came to be detained. However, in nutshell, they are as follows : -
3. The ground 2 shows that the dete
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
