SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Milan Sarcanski v. State through its Special P. P. Adv. Bhope


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Chari
For the Respondents: Mr. Bhobe

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and recovery of contraband. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the validity of the evidence and search. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observation on the evidence and legal standards for conviction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

1. The appellant is an accused in Special Criminal Case No. 6/95 on the file of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court of Mapusa. He challenges the convictions and sentence passed by the Special Judge under S.20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 , whereby the appellant was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, or in default, to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for two years.

2. According to the prosecution, on 5th January, 1995, a raiding party of the Anti Narcotic Cell, Panaji, led by Mr. G. M. Jadhav, Police Inspector, was a making a random check in Calangute area. The raiding party also consisted of one Dy. SP Shri Shukla, On information received, the raiding party went to the house where the accused was staying. Admittedly, it was at 8'O clock in the night. When P.I. Jadhav entered the verandah of' the house where the ap
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top