Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Mulji Umershi Shah – Appellant
Versus
Paradesia Builders Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and property details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence and claims of possession. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. assessment of potential forgery in documents. (Para 8 , 20) |
| 5. possession considerations in injunction cases. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. conditions for appointing a receiver in injunction suits. (Para 13 , 14 , 19) |
| 7. confirmation and modification of the trial court's orders. (Para 25 , 26) |
1. This group of six appeals arises out of the order passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay on 2nd November, 1996 in Notice of Motion No. 2608 of 1996 in Suit No. 2784 of 1996.
2. The facts have been stated in details in the impugned order and, therefore, I would recapitualate briefly the essential and necessary facts for disposal of these appeals only.
3. The disputed property comprises of gala Nos. 1, 48, 68, 15, 16, 17, 18, 26 on the ground floor, all galas on the entire first floor and gala Nos. 201, 216 to 226 on the 2nd floor of Bezzola Commercial Complex, Sion Trombay Road, Chembur, Mumbai. Mulji Umershi Shah, the plaintiff and appellant in Appeal No. 39 of 1997 filed a suit before the City Civil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
