Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Chemox Chemical Industries Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of winding-up petition and liquidation process (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues regarding board powers post-liquidator appointment (Para 5) |
| 3. clarification of board powers and bifr role (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. implications of bifr registration on ongoing proceedings (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's final order to stay proceedings (Para 10) |
1.Leave under R.19(3) of the Company Court Rules, 1989 granted to the applicants to take out a Judge' Summons in terms of draft Judge' Summons handed in. By consent, made returnable forthwith.
2. The petitioners have filed the petition for winding up against the Company. By order of this Court dated 13th November, 1998 the Official Liquidator was appointed as Provisional Liquidator. By the present application, the Company has moved this Court to stay the order dated 13th November, 1998 admitting the Company Petition and appointing the Official liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator till the disposal of Reference under BIFR. By a further prayer clause (b), the Company has prayed that the Official Liquidator be restrained from taking further steps as per the order of this Court dated 13th November, 1998 without obtaining any prior permission from B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
