SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 11

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
J. H. Bhatia, J.
Sharan P. Khanna v. Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. and Another


Table of Content
1. tenant's possession and options regarding property (Para 2 , 3)
2. cheque issuance and subsequent legal actions (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments regarding representations and intent (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's views on legal recourse and charge distinctiveness (Para 8 , 9)
5. double jeopardy in relation to distinct offences (Para 11 , 12 , 16)

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. To state in brief, the petitioner is the owner of certain premises. On 29-10-1983, an agreement was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent No. 1 in respect of the suit premises. As per that agreement, the premises were given to the respondent No. 1 on license on payment of license fee of Rs. 3 lakh per month inclusive of all Municipal taxes. This agreement was to be valid for a period of 5 years. The same agreement also provided that the respondent No. 1 would have an option to purchase the premises within a period of 5 years from the date of agreement. The consideration for sale of the property was to be decided mutually by negotiation. However, the respondent No. 1 made payment of Rs. 1,28,52,000/- to the petitioner as earnest money out






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top