SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
A. S. Gadkari, J
Arjun Babarao Parche and Others v. State of Maharashtra


Table of Content
1. the appeal against a lower court's conviction based on insufficient evidence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details around the incident and the circumstances surrounding the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. discussion on the insufficiency of evidence and legal standards required for conviction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. final outcome of the case leading to acquittal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 11.6.2008 passed by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.125 of 2007, whereby the appellants / accused were convicted of the offences punishable under S.498A and S.306 r/w S.34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced accordingly.

2. Heard submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The facts in brief are as under :
On the basis of report by Babarao Parche (accused No.2) accidental death was noted as A.D. No.65 of 2006 under S.174 of the Criminal Procedure Code . When the dead body of deceased Rekha (informer's daughter - inlaw) and thereafter her child aged about six months old was also found in the same well on 8.9.2006. Thus, inquiry followed and spot panchanama was drawn (Exh.40), as also inques


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top