Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Coram : Anoop V. Mohta & F.M. Reis, JJ
Uran Education Society's English Medium School – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedures and responsibilities under the rte act (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. interpretation of the responsibilities of state and central government on education (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. school's obligations under the rte act (Para 11 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. supreme court clarifications regarding rte act and reimbursement (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. state's obligations towards early childhood education (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. reimbursement policies for schools under rte act (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. final order directing reimbursement to schools (Para 37) |
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties in view of the urgency expressed and the issues raised.
2. The petitioners, an unaided private school, imparting education in pre - school and elementary school, have filed this writ petition referring to the provisions of Art.14, Art.19(1)(g), Art.21, Art.21A and Art.226 of the Constitution of India and S.11, S.12 of the Right to Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and R.12(b) of the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
