Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Suryabhan Namdeo Vakte v. Bhagirathibai alias Vatsalabai Tulshidas Chavan
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of partition amidst allegations of fraudulent will execution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. contentions regarding will's validity and defendants' responsibility to prove execution. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. suspicious circumstances surrounding the will and necessity of stringent proof requirements. (Para 11 , 12 , 21 , 25 , 29) |
| 4. conclusion that the appeal lacks substantial questions of law due to evidence provided. (Para 28 , 33) |
1. The appeal is filed to challenge the judgment and decree of Special Civil Suit No.31/1999 which was pending in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon and also to challenge the judgment and order of Regular Civil Appeal No.50/2003 which was pending in the District Court Kopargaon. Respondent No.1 had filed suit for partition and separate possession in respect of immovable and movable property. Half share is given to respondent, plaintiff by the Courts below. Original defendant Nos. 3, 7 and 8 have challenged the decision. Both sides are heard.
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that suit property was joint Hindu family property of her father Ananda and her uncle Namdeo. It is the case of the plaintiff that she is only heir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
