Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
P.S. Patankar, J
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dicitex Furnishing Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the claim and applicant's financial distress. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. details regarding document submission and ongoing communication. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. dispute over claim assessment and the signing of discharge vouchers. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. arguments presented by both parties regarding coercion and claim validation. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. judicial reflections on arbitration and financial duress implications. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 6. procedural guidelines for arbitration despite discharge agreements. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 7. court orders for arbitrator appointment while addressing disputes. (Para 60 , 61) |
| 8. final conclusions and orders from the court. (Para 62 , 63) |
1. By this application filed under S.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Arbitration Act), the applicant seeks appointment of an arbitrator. The respondents have raised an objection about maintainability of this application on the ground that the applicant had signed the discharge voucher / sheet voluntarily given to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
