BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J
Edward alias Adward Paul Machado Mumbai v. J. R. Aryan Chairperson Airport New Delhi and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petitioner's claims and historical context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. conditions of eviction application and background facts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against eviction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. details on written statement and previous petitions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. consolidation of arguments by the petitioner. (Para 20) |
| 6. court’s observations on procedural aspects. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. interpretation of 'airport premises' under the law. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. discussion on eviction notice and its validity. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. rights and limitations regarding summary eviction proceedings. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 10. final ruling on the merits of the case. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. establishment of the petitioner's ownership claims. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. complications arising from the ownership dispute. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 13. legal precedents relevant to the case. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 14. conclusion of proceedings and final orders. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
1. Rule. Respondents waive service.
2. By this petition under Art.2
Ram Daan (Dead) through LRs v. Urban Improvement Trust
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia & Anr.
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Thummala Krishna Rao & Anr.
L. S. Nair v. Hindustan Steel Ltd., Bhilai & Ors.
Rame Gowda (Dead) by LRs v. M. Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.