Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
*R. M. Borde, Mangesh S. Patil, JJ.
Charushila v. State of Maharashtra
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. methodology of filling vacancies for horizontal reservation (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners object to circular impacting reservation claims (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. opposition to claims of migration between reserved categories (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. reserved category competition in open category (Para 9 , 37) |
| 5. classification and understanding of vertical and horizontal reservations (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. implications of migration rules in compartmentalized reservations (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. entitlement of reserved category candidates in open category based on merit (Para 36 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. conclusions on reservations and merit-based claims in selection (Para 46 , 49) |
| 9. final directives concerning competition and migration (Para 50 , 51) |
1. In this group of petitions, the question, that arises for consideration, is as regards methodology of filling in the vacancies prescribed for horizontal reservation which flows from Art.16(1) of the Constitution of India . Another question, that would be required to be considered is, as to whether rule of migration / shifting can be applied and to what extent.
2. In Writ Petition No. 4159 of 2018, the petitioners are objecting
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
