BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Chandrachud, J
Altaf Fakir Baig v. Goel Ganga Deve.(IND) Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. limitation is a mixed question requiring evidence. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 13) |
| 2. court must read plaints as a whole. (Para 3 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments must show real versus illusory cause of action. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. appeal allowed and suit restored. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. Aggrieved by a judgment and order dated 31st August 2021, passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division Pune in Special Civil Suit No.794 of 2021, Appellants have preferred this First Appeal. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court rejected Appellants' plaint under Order VII , R.11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure ("CPC", for brevity), as barred by law of limitation.
2. Appeal was listed for admission today. Since the issue was short, i.e., could trial Court summarily reject the plaint under Order VII , R.11(d) on the ground of law of limitation, since limitation is a mixed question of law and fact, with the consent of the counsel we decided to take up the Appeal for final hearing at admission stage.
3. It is Appellants' case that they have averred in the plaint as to when the cause of action arose and Appellants should be given an opportunity in trial to prove and establish those averments, the issue of li
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.