SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6187

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
*R. G. Avachat, Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Shankar Harishchandra Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra


1. The appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under S.302 and S.201 of Indian Penal Code and therefore, sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and R.I. for three years, respectively, with default stipulation, vide the judgment and order dated 02.05.2019, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Latur, in Sessions case No.92 of 2016. The appellant is, therefore, in this appeal before us.

2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as follows: -
Appellant married Karishma (deceased) on 10.07.2016, at village Kavtha - Pati. The appellant started suspecting character of his wife (Karishma). He, therefore, assaulted on her cheek. On 2-3 occasions, post marriage, Karishma had been to her parental house. She had related the same to her mother. It so happened that on 25.08.2016, Karishma (deceased) was found dead at her matrimonial home. It was said that saree was around her neck. Her brother - in - law Balaji informed Karishma's father (PW 2 - Ram) that she committed suicide. PW 2 - Ram along with her wife and other relations, therefore, visited Karishma's house. After funeral, they went back to their village. On the other hand, the son of village P
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top