SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6218

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. S. Shinde, J
Chandiram Anandram Hemnani v. Senior Citizens Appellate Tribunal/District Collector


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Adv. N. S. Jain
For the Respondents: Adv. M. L. Sangit

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

2. This petition, invoking Art.227 of the Constitution of India, filed by senior citizens depicts the plight of the senior citizens who are required to contest litigations against their own son and daughter - in - law to enable them to enjoy their own house property. The instant case is an example where the parents were compelled to invoke the provisions of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 , to secure the protection granted to the senior citizens.

3. By way of instant petition, the petitioners who are parents of respondent No.3 have impugned the order dated 07.08.2000 passed by the Appellate Tribunal under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by which the appeal filed by their daughter - in - law - respondent No.4 is allowed and the application filed by the present petitioners invoking provisions of the Act came to be rejected. The petitioners' are aggrieved by the decision of the appellate tribunal which has set aside the order passed by the Tribunal which had ordered eviction of the respond







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top