SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351621

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Ramdev Singh Jadeja – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent
BAIL APPLICATION NO.4519 OF 2025



2025:BHC-AS:55445 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.4519 OF 2025

1. Ramdev Singh Jadeja

2. Vishal Mir

3. Chintan Arvindbhai Desai …Applicants Versus Union Territory of Daman & Diu and Ors. …Respondents  Mr. Manoj Mohite, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Bhavesh i/b.

Vivek Pandey, Advocate for Applicants in BA/4519/2025.

 Mr. Ashwin Thool a/w Mr. Ayush Singh a/w Archishmati Chandramore, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2 (U.T.)

 Mr. Shreyas Uday Lalit a/w Mr. Varun Thokal a/w Mr.

Aditya Singh i/b. Mr. Varun Thokal, for Respondent No.4 / Intervenor.

CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

RESERVED ON: 9TH DECEMBER 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 16TH DECEMBER 2025 JUDGMENT:-

1. The Applicants seek their release on bail in connection with FIR No. 0039 of 2025 dated 26th August 2025, registered with the Coastal Police Station, Kadaiya, Daman, for offences punishable under Section 140(2), 308(7) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNS’). The Police filed the Final Report No. 37 of 2025, before the JMFC, Daman, on 17th October 2025. Pertinent to note is that, while filing the Final Report, the investigating agency has dropped the non-bailable offences as initially applied in the FIR and retained only offences punishable under Sections 308(7), 258, 238, 241, 3(5), 115(2) of the BNS, 2023. Thus, the offences as alleged by the Police against the Applicants and Co-accused in the charge sheet, as on date, are all bailable offences

2. The facts of the case in brief are as under:

2.1 On 25th August 2025, the Complainant namely, Aajessh Patel and his friends, traveled to Daman from Surat, in an Innova car. They purchased liquor from a wine shop and intended to have a party in a farmhouse. 5 to 6 persons intercepted them, searched their vehicle, and having spotted the liquor, identified themselves to be police officials. They directed the Complainant and his friends to accompany them to the Police Station. The Complainant and his friends, intimidated by the Police, acted as per their instructions and followed them to the Police Headquarters. These persons, were none other than Police Constables, Head Constable and a Police Officer from the Crime Branch, Daman, Union Territory of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. The Applicants are three constables.

2.2 The Complainant and his friends were made to sit in a room on the ground floor of the Police Headquarters, their mobile phones were seized, they were taken to an upstairs room, slapped a couple of times and interrogated. Another Police Officer arrived whose presence was intended to further intimidate them. The Complainant showed to the Police the receipt of the purchase of liquor, however, the Police deliberately declared it as a fake and threatened to implicate them in offences punishable with 14 years of imprisonment. The Complainant and his friends, getting a drift of the intent of the Police personnel and, out of fear, offered to pay some money for their release. The Applicants and others immediately demanded an amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- as a price for releasing the Complainant and his friends.

2.3 Another Police Officer arrived to negotiate with the Complainant since the Complainant conveyed his inability to raise such a huge amount. Finally, the Complainant was told to arrange an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/-. His mobile phone was returned to him to enable him to call his relatives/friends. The call was monitored by the Police on the speaker mode. The Complainant first called his mother who did not answer, hence, he called his friend, Vicky Patel and requested him to inform his mother the requirement of Rs. 10,00,000/- for his release in a liquor case.

2.4 Another neighbor, Bhavin called Aajessh on Vicky’s phone and assured him that they were arranging the money and later at around 8 pm, conveyed that they were leaving with the money. The Police demanded the live location of Vicky and Bhavin and were monitoring their location through calls. When Vicky reach

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top