HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARTI ARUN SATHE
VIJAY NAMDEV GUJAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING – Respondent
WP/4836/2025
##PAGE1##
909-WP-4836-25.DOC
JYOTI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAJESH
MANE
Digitally signed by ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2025.12.23
19:49:57 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.4836 OF 2025
Vijay Namdev Gujar ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra,
Department Of Housing ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Prasad Dhakephalkar Senior Advocate (V.C.) a/w.Mr. Abhinav Bhatkar
i/b. Ms.Kavita Narvekar, for Petitioner.
Ms. Vrushali Kabre, AGP for Respondent No.1/State.
Mr. P.H.Kantharia, for Respondent Nos.2 to 6/SRA.
Mr. Kshitish Shukla for Respondent Nos.7 & 8.
Mr. Shakeep Shaikh, Ms. Afreen Thanevala i/b. Vis Legis Law Practice,
for Respondent No.9.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
AARTI SATHE, JJ.
DATE: 23 December 2025
P.C.
1. On 25th November 2025 we had passed a detailed order after hearing
learned counsel for the parties.
2. The issues before the Court in the present proceedings were twofold.
Firstly, Respondent No.9 had defaulted in the payment of transit rent.
Consequently, an inquiry was required to be undertaken by the Competent Officer
of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (‘SRA’ for short) to determine the transit rent
payable to the Petitioners by Respondent No.9. The second issue pertained to the
possession of the tenements, as it was the case of the Petitioners that although the
Page 1 of 8
Mane
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:28:59 :::
##PAGE2##909-WP-4836-25.DOC
remaining Petitioners had been allotted their respective tenements, the keys thereof
were not handed over to them. In pursuance of the orders passed by this Court the
Competent Officer of the SRA viz. Assistant Registrar Co-operative Societies, has
passed an order dated 11th December 2025, whereby in respect of the 33
Petitioners an amount of Rs.3,59,24,701/- has been determined to be payable to
the Petitioners. Such amount would now be required to be paid, as the order is a
detailed and reasoned order passed after hearing all the parties and upon
consideration of all relevant facts, including the arrears of rent, which in fact
pertain to the period 2018–19. It is thus clear from the facts of the case that the
developer having avoided making payment of the rent had utilised the amounts
for the project, thereby depriving the basic entitlement of the Petitioners, to receive
such amounts, not only as per the agreement but also under the Rules and
Regulations and Circulars issued by the SRA. It is in such context we had made the
following observations in our order dated 25th November 2025:
2. The development in question is of a slum under the provisions of
Regulation 33(10) of Development Control and Promotion
Regulations, 2034 for Greater Mumbai.
3. The learned counsel for the developers-respondent nos.7 & 8
states that his client is ready and willing to pay the legitimate
amounts of transit rent which are due and payable. The calculation
in that regard is intended to be submitted to the Competent
Authority of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Let the petitioners
in that event also calculate the amount of arrears of transit rent and
place it for consideration of the Competent Officer.
4. In this view of the matter, in our opinion, it would be in the
interest of justice that the Competent Officer of the SRA intervenes
in the issue in regard to the amount of transit rent, which is due and
payable to the petitioners. Let a personal hearing in that regard be
granted by the Competent Officer, which shall be within two weeks
from today and an appropriate decision be taken on the rival
contentions and clear orders be passed on the amount of transit rent
being payable to the petitioners.
Page 2 of 8
Mane
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:28:59 :::
##PAGE3##909-WP-4836-25.DOC
5. In view of the fair stand taken on behalf of the developers of their
readiness and willingness to pay the amount due and payable as per
the rules, in fact further adjudication of the petition is not called for.
However, as the petitioners are slum dwellers, we cannot expect
them
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.