2025:BHC-AS:57102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4549 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4230 OF 2025 Nasir Dastagir Sayyad …Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Rajendra S. Bidkar, for the applicant.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

DATED: 22^nd DECEMBER 2025 PC:-

1. Pursuant to order dated 12^th December 2025, a compliance report of surety is received by the Registrar (Judicial-1) and is placed before the Court today. As per the said Report, the Applicant has made a false statement that surety papers have not been accepted by the Trial Court and learned Trial Court has specifically stated that the Applicant has not understood the difference between “acceptance of surety papers” and “acceptance of the suretyship” by the order of this Court.

2. On being faced by this Report, Mr. Rajendra Bidkar, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, states that it is not that the surety papers not accepted by the Court but because of the absence of ‘Occupation Certificate’ of the flat of the brother-in-law of the Applicant, there is an inquiry pending and because of the sa