SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 223097

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAKHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
MINAXI B. PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THROUGH THE CHEIF REGISTRAR ) AND 2 ORS. – Respondent


2025:BHC-OS:18109-DB by PALLAVI P M W A A A L H R L G E A A N V O I D N R K A AR M W D 2

0 0 a A A 2 : t 5 H R e 5 7 : G . E 1 :2 A N 0 9 O . D 0 N R 8 K A AR +0530 Pallavi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.972 OF 2024 Minaxi B. Parmar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra (Through the Chief Register) & Ors. ...Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr. Mandar Soman, a/w Mr. Aditya Rai, Divakar Rai, Vayukumar Tiwari and Mr. Nitin Rai i/b. Mr. Ramchandra Rane for Petitioner.

Ms. Madhura Deshmukh, AGP, for Respondent No.1.

Ms. Anuja Tirmali i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent No.2 & 3 – BMC.

Dr. Mahendra Khandade, Mumbai- K East Ward present in Court.

Mr. Akshay Patil a/w Ms. Nisha Shah i/b. Kalpesh Joshi Associates for Respondent No.4.

______________________________________________________

CORAM : M.S. Sonak &

Advait M. Sethna, JJ.

DATED : 3 October 2025 Oral Order (Per : M.S. Sonak, J.):-

1. Heard Mr Mandar Soman, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Ms Anuja Tirmali, appears for the 2nd and 3rd Respondents (MCGM), and Mr Akshay Patil appears for the

4th Respondent.

2. Rule. The Rule is made

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top