HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLAHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SATYAVAN JAMSANDEKAR
YOGESH MANGALSEN BEHL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
WP/15217/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VINA WRIT PETITION NO. 15217 OF 2023
ARVIND KHADPE
Yogesh Mangalsen Behl .. Petitioner
Digitally signed by
VINA ARVIND
KHADPE
Date: 2025.12.15 Versus
14:44:13 +0530
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sanket S. Bora a/w. Deepak Sharma a/w. Archana Shetty a/w.
Vidhi Punamiya i/b. SPCM Legal , Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Khamchandani, Advocates for the Respondent / Revenue.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA &
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.
DATE: December 10, 2025
P. C.
1. The above Writ Petition seeks to challenge the Assessment Order dated 30th April 2023 passed under Section 143(3) as well as the Demand Notice issued under Section 156 dated 30th April 2023. The short ground on which the order is challenged is a breach of principles of natural justice. According to the Petitioner, they sought for a personal hearing through Video Conferencing (V.C.) on 27th April 2023 and mentioned that the desired date of the V.C. is 28th April 2023. According to the Petitioner, he learnt from the portal that the date for the V.C. was fixed on 29th April 2023
at 4:00 pm, and no intimation thereof was given to the Petitioner for him to participate in the V.C.
2. It is the further case of the Petitioner that as can be seen from the screenshot of the portal of the IT Department, though the portal reflects that the V.C. date is 29th April 2023 and the V.C. is approved, no V.C. link was ever provided on the portal for the Petitioner to participate in the V.C. He, therefore, submitted that the Assessment Order is passed in breach of the principles of natural justice.
3. An affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of the Department. In the affidavit-in-reply, it is once again reiterated [as recorded in the assessment order] that a personal hearing through V.C. was given to the Petitioner and not availed of by him.
4. However, we find that the notice referred to in the Assessment Order dated 28th April 2023, and which purports to inform the Petitioner of the date and time of the V.C., is not before the Court. We would like to see the aforesaid Notice and the proof of service thereof. This apart, the Department will also have to explain as to why the “V.C. link details” on the Income Tax Portal is showing blank and whether any link was ever supplied to the Petitioner for participating in the V.C., with appropriate proof.
5. All this material shall be brought on record by the Income Tax Department by filing an additional affidavit of the concerned officer. This affidavit shall be filed by 31st December 2025 and copy of the same shall be served on the advocates for the Petitioner. We now place the matter on 7th January 2026 under the caption for ad-interim relief. We make it clear to the parties that we may dispose of the Writ Petition at that stage itself, time permitting.
6. Stand over to 7th January 2026.
7. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.
[ AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR , J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.