HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLAHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SATYAVAN JAMSANDEKAR
the commissioer of central excise-pune-iii – Appellant
Versus
m/s dhariwal induistries limited and ors – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
VINA
ARVIND
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2007
KHADPE
Digitally signed by
VINA ARVIND Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise,
KHADPE
Date: 2025.12.15 Pune – I, Commissionerate, GST Bhawan. .. Appellant
11:42:58 +0530
Versus
Dhariwal Industries Limited & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. J. B. Mishra a/w. Mamta Omle a/w. Rupesh Dubey, Advocates for
the Appellant.
Mr. Sujay Kantawala a/w. Mayur Shroff, Aishwarya Kantawala, Jeffry Caleb & Ayushi Jha i/b. Brijesh Pathak, Advocates for the
Respondents.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA &
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.
DATE: December 10, 2025
P. C.
1. The above Appeal has been placed on board today to determine whether the present Appeal would lie before this Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, or whether the same would lie before the Hon’ble Supreme Court under Section 35L. It was the submission of the Respondent that the Appeal would lie only to the Hon’ble Supreme Court and not before this Hon’ble Court because the order of the Appellate Tribunal relates to determination, not only to the rate of duty of excise, but also of the valuation of goods for the purposes of Assessment. Once
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.