HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA
NAYAN DHANAJI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
BA/2209/2025
2025:BHC-AS:55914
[Corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 17.12.2025.] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Bail Application No.2428 of 2025
1. Bhawgir @ Mahesh Chhotugir Gosavi,
Age: 30 years, Occ.: Business
Residing at Kalamsare, Taluka Shirpur
District Dhule
(Presently at Krantinagar, Shirpur,
District Dhule)
2. Sanjay Bhagwan Nikumbhe,
Age: 49 years, Occ.: Driver
Residing at Krantinagar, Shirpur,
District Dhule
(Both at Present Yerawada Central Jail,
Pune) … Applicants
(Org. Accused Nos.5 and 6)
versus
The State of Maharashtra
(At the instance of Yavat Police Station,
Pune vide C.R. No.965 of 2024) … Respondent
With
Bail Application No.2209 of 2025
Nayan Dhanaji Chaudhary,
Age-21, Occ.- Labour,
R/at Tulai, Murbad,
Dist. Thane.
(Presently at Yerawada Central Jail) … Applicant
(Original Accused No.4)
versus
The State of Maharashtra
(Through Yawat Police Station
Pune, Maharashtra) … Respondent With Bail Application No.2347 of 2025 Bhavesh Santosh Patil Age- 25, Occ.- Service, R/at Itade, Savad, Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane.
(Presently at Yerawada Central Jail) … Applicant (Original Accused No.3)
versus The State of Maharashtra (Through Yewat Police Station Pune, Maharashtra) … Respondent ----
Mr Sachin Deokar, for the applicant in BA/2428/25.
Mr Sanjay Patil, for the applicant in BA/2209/25 and BA/2347/25.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State.
PSI Maroti Iranna M, Yavat Police Station, Pune Rural.
----
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
Date: 11 December 2025.
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. By these applications, the applicants (accused Nos.3, 4, 5, and 6) seek bail in connection with CR No.965 of 2024, registered at Yavat Police Station, Pune, for offences punishable under Sections 180 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that on 1 October 2024, accused No.1 was apprehended under the Patas Bridge on the Pune-Solapur Highway and was found to be in possession of counterfeit currency notes amounting to Rs.1,50,000/-. Further investigation revealed that accused No.1 received these counterfeit notes from accused No.2, who, in turn, had obtained them from accused Nos.3 and 4. Further inquiries revealed that accused Nos.3 and 4 had received the said counterfeit currency from accused Nos. 5 and 6.
4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants, asserting the applicants’ innocence, contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the crime solely based on the statement of the co-accused. It is submitted that the alleged counterfeit currency was recovered from accused No.1, not from the applicants. Apart from the bare assertions, there is no material to connect the applicants with the commission of the offence. They further submit that the applicants have been languishing in jail since 3 October 2024 and that, despite the filing of the charge sheet, charges have not yet been framed. Accused No.2 has already been released on bail, and the applicants are willing to abide by any conditions this Court deems fit to impose.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/ State, opposing the applicant’s request for bail, submits that the offence is of a grave and serious nature. The applicants actively participated in the commission of the offence. The learned APP raises concern about granting bail to the applicants, as they may tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.
6. This Court has given anxious consideration to the rival contentions canvassed across the Bar and perused the records.
7. A bare perusal of the statements of Mahendra Fanse, Bhanudas Bandgar, Hiralal Khomne, and Ganesh Mutekar, all recorded on 2 October 2024, does not indicate involvement of the applicants in the present crime. According to these witnesses, accused No.1 did not provide information regarding the source of the alleged counterfeit currency. Furthermore, in the disclosure panchanama recorded on 5 October 2024, accused No.1 did not implica
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.