HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
THE IRRIGATION OFFICER NANDUR MADHYAMESHWAR PROJECT DIVISION NASHIK – Appellant
Versus
SMT.HAUSHABAI RAMDAS TEKANNAR AND ANR. – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2018
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 27211 OF 2017
ANAND The Executive Engineer, ..Applicant
Nandur Madhyameshwar Project, Nashik
SUDHAKAR
SUDAME
Versus
Smt. Haushabai Ramdas Tekannar & anr. ..Respondents
Digitally signed
by ANAND
Ms. Chaitrali Deshmukh, Advocate, for the Applicant
SUDHAKAR
Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. GP, for the State
SUDAME
Date: 2025.12.10
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
19:38:40 +0530
DATE : 10.12.2025
P. C.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2018
1. This Civil Application has been filed for condonation of delay of
4 years and 254 days in filing the First Appeal.
2. Office remarks show that Respondent No. 1 – Claimant has been duly served. None appears on behalf of the Claimant when the matter
is called out.
3. I have heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Patil, learned Addl. GP and gone through the contents of the Civil Application. According to me, a case is made out to allow the present
Civil Application.
4. Supreme Court in the judgment of Collector, Land Acquisition,
Anantnag and another Vs. Mst. Katji and Others reported in 1987 SC
1353, has held that:
“Every day’s delay must be explained” does not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.