SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248402

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SHRI. S.R. AGRAWAL, REGISTRAR(JUDL II)
GADLYA ALIAS VIKRAM BARKYA PATIL AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
M/S NOBEL CONSTRUCTION THR. PARTNERS (A) ZIYA ABDUL SATTAR NAMRE AND (B) SUNIL V. PATIL AND ORS – Respondent
FAST/31312/2025



FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 31312 OF 2025

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order

appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and

Registrar’s orders

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL

REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

DATE : 11/12/2025

Adv. Vedant Tiwari i/by Adv. R.D. Joshi present for the

Appellant

The above numbered First Appeal (ST) is listed

for second time on the board of Registrar for removal of office objections. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the office

objections are not removed.

Here reference to Chapter V of the Bombay High

Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 [For short “Rules”] may be conveniently made. It states about Procedure

after presentation, removal of office objections etc. In view of provisions under Rule 3 (ii), the

Advocates/Parties are expected to remove the office

objections within 14 days from the date of notification.

Rule (5) further provides that, if office objections

are not removed as provided under Rule 3, the office shall place the matter before the Registrar, who shall

refuse the registration of all such matters.

The prescribed time to remove the office objections provided under Rules 1960 has been expired long back. Thereafter also 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to non removal of office objections. However, instead of passing order of refusal of registration or dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to remove the office objections.

In turn, learned advocate for the appellant is directed to remove the office objections within 02 weeks (excluding Christmas Vacation) without fail. On failure, registration of First Appeal (ST) would stand refused without further reference to the Court of Registrar. No further extension will be granted.

Sd/-

REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

sat-R(J-II)-11.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top