SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248512

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
SAIFUL @ YOYO SHAMIMA SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:55976

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3915 OF 2025

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1049 OF 2025

Saiful @ Yoyo Shamima Shaikh … Appellant

versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents

………...

Mr. Vivek Nishad, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. C.D.Mali, APP for the State.

Mr. Raviraj Paramane, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

Digitally signed

SONALIby SONALI

SATISH KILAJE

SATISH Date:

KILAJE 2 1 0 4 2 :4 5 1 .1 :0 2 2 .18

+0700

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 17th DECEMBER, 2025.

P.C. :

1. This application is for suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail in connection with C.R.No. 659 of 2017 registered with Bandra Police Station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “POCSO Act”) passed in Judgment and Order dated 04.09.2025 in Sessions Case No. 144 of 2018 whereby the accused / appellant came to be

convicted for the offences punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous im

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top